Ecco il link:
http://news.justia.com/cases/amigahyperion/370498/39/0.pdf
Da alcuni punti si evince chiaramente che anche se AI volesse andare avanti non potrebbe comunque fare molto visto che non ha diritto di comportarsi come Amiga Washington......
Moooooolto interessante.
EDIT: Mi sa che Hyperion adesso fa una controcausa con i fiocchi.... comunque sembrerebbe veramente che Hyperion possa utilizzare AmigaOS come marchio "per sempre"!!!
EDIT 2 (Bill - William Kinsell - avvocato difensore Hyperion VOF - incazzato - pag.22):
...
70. Because of the above acts, Hyperion asks the Court to enjoin Amiga Delaware from continuing these wrongful acts and to award it monetary damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
...
E chiede i danni (pag. 24-25)
5
(f) Even if one assumes that Amiga Washington was not insolvent and that all
6
required parties gave their written consent to the transfer of Amiga Washington’s rights, (i)
7
Hyperion exercised its “best efforts” as required of it under the Agreement, and (ii), Hyperion
8
has at no time, and will not in the future in its dealings with ACube Systems Srl, violate the
9
provisions of its license under the November 3, 2001 Agreement. Amiga Delaware therefore
10
has no valid basis upon which to terminate the licensing agreement; and
11
(g) Hyperion is entitled to whatever other declaratory relief is required to fully
12
adjudicate the rights of the parties to the Agreement pursuant to RCW 7.24.010, .020, .030,
13
.050, .080, and .090.
14
2. For a declaration that the Amiga Washington/KMOS Contract is void as a
15
fraudulent conveyance, and for a judgment awarding title to Hyperion of all rights of any kind
16
covered by said Contract;
17
3. For a declaration that the Itec/KMOS Contract is void as a fraudulent
18
conveyance and, to the extent that said rights have not already been awarded to Hyperion under
19
paragraph 1 above, a judgment awarding all rights of any kind covered by said Contract, to the
20
extent that they are not owned by third parties (e.g., Eyetech);